2017 - a year of keeping calm and carrying on

24 November 2017
| By Industry |
image
image
expand image

Blake Briggs writes that despite the many challenges which confronted the superannuation industry in 2017, it was a case of keeping calm and carrying on.

As we near the end of 2017 the superannuation industry should be proud of the outstanding result that it has delivered for consumers. 

The median growth fund returned over 10 per cent in the year to September, with the upper quartile funds returning close to 12 per cent. By any measure the industry’s performance has been strong, clearly outstripping the All Ordinaries index.  

Legislation defining the objective of the superannuation system has stalled in parliament, but in spite of this funds have stayed calm and continued to deliver. 

The Productivity Commission’s granular examination of the superannuation system has continued apace and the industry awaits its preliminary recommendations in early 2018. 

Speculation has been amplified by open discussion of the Future Fund assuming a role as the national manager of default contributions. Countless commentators, fed up with political point-scoring, have welcomed the public musings of Future Fund Chairman, and former Treasurer, Peter Costello. 

Costello’s “pox on both your houses” proposal appears to have run into a dry gully in the corridors of power, however whether the Productivity Commission will be wooed by his public musing is yet to be seen. 

Without doubt the Future Fund could upend the superannuation industry as we know it and pose serious questions of passive superannuation providers that rely on default contributions for their survival.  

A distant memory to all but a small cohort of retirees in Melbourne’s leafy eastern suburbs and a team of hardworking Australian Taxation Office (ATO) officials is the impact of successive Federal Budgets.

The 2017 Budget was perhaps the most substantial package of superannuation tax reforms since the 2016 Budget. Collectively, however, the Government has achieved its goal of materially limiting the extent to which superannuation can be used for wealth transfer. 

The Government has committed to no further changes in the life of the Turnbull Government, a promise matched by Shadow Treasurer Chris Bowen (apart from further changes already announced). 

The net result, however, has been an unprecedented increase in the complexity of the system. Uncertainty also stems from multiple Budget measures yet to be legislated, such as the first home buyer saving scheme, which consumers can conceivably already make contributions towards to but is not yet the law of the land. 

On the provision of life insurance, superannuation funds continue to walk a fine line. Account erosion amongst younger and lower income savers is a serious issue, but the repricing of premiums over previous years has put trustees under considerable pressure. 

The challenge is for the cross-industry working group (comprising all the major associations as well as consumer representatives) to deliver a tangible and meaningful solution before the patience of policy-makers is exhausted. 

Drawing attention to some of the good work done by the industry which flies under the radar. The Gateway Network Governance Body - backed by the FSC, AIST, ASFA and gateways and employers - is now fully operational and helping ensure a stable and reliable Super Transaction Network. 

Steady progress towards a retirement income framework has also been clouded by the headline differences between industry sectors. 

At the recent FSC Retirement Income Products Conference, the Minister committed to implementing a common framework that will guide all trustees towards providing products for retirees that meet the needs of our rapidly ageing population. 

The CIPRs proposal is not a priority for all funds as some funds have a younger demographic profile than others. However, there is an acute awareness across the sector that the consumers of one fund should not be disadvantaged as a result of the inaction of another. 

Ultimately the goal is to create a framework that is sufficiently flexible to allow all funds to provide the retirement income products that suit their consumers, overlayed with robust protections. 
If this was not enough, the year may yet finish with a bang. 

Legislation is currently before the Senate that introduces a suite of new consumer protections, enhanced prudential oversight and a requirement for all trustees to appoint independent directors. 

The reforms continue to divide the industry and are hard fought in political circles, but are passing unnoticed by consumers. 

The challenge in 2018 will be for the industry to focus on the goal that binds us - delivering adequate retirement incomes for consumers. 

 

Blake Briggs is Senior Policy Manager for Superannuation at the Financial Services Council

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

3 months 4 weeks ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months ago

The asset manager is bolstering its investments in the global energy transition and climate opportunities....

3 days 2 hours hence

The ethical investment manager has reported record FUM as its growth trajectory continues apace....

19 hours ago

The $135 billion fund has transitioned away from TAL Life Insurance following an “extensive tender process”....

19 hours 58 minutes ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND