Investment properties are the second largest sector for investments outside superannuation and Australians face a myriad of structural risks when holding these assets, according to Rice Warner.
The research house’s latest analysis found of the $2.3 trillion total personal investments as at 30 June 2016, 40.6 per cent were invested in investment property, 44.3 per cent in cash and term deposits, 12.09 per cent in equities, and 2.1 per cent in fixed interest and loans.
Rice Warner said as Australian investors were predominantly tied to variable rate loans, any increase in rates would feed into the cost of servicing mortgages, especially for investors who were using negative gearing and hence dependent on income other than their rent to service the mortgages.
It said other structural risks for property assets included:
Rice Warner noted that allowing super to be accessed to fund housing purchase would further escalate risks.
“The combination of dilution of retirement savings and further upward pressure on property prices means such a measure would at best be counter-productive for those whom it is intended to help, and at worst would further increase the risk of the property booms in Sydney and Melbourne ending in tears,” the analysis said.
Australia’s second-largest super fund has explained its approach to the Asian giant and how it is balancing underlying risk, adding that avoiding China altogether may not be a “doable strategy”.
New research indicates that industry superannuation funds are poised for significant growth, posing a challenge to traditional active managers.
Challenger reported growth of 190 per cent in lifetime annuity sales, having realised an “extraordinary” opportunity in retirement.
The ethical asset manager has launched an infrastructure debt fund in association with specialist manager Infradebt.
Add new comment