O’Dwyer awaiting PC on ‘opt-in’ versus ‘opt-out’

27 July 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Minister for Revenue and Financial Services, Kelly O’Dwyer has acknowledged that the Government’s next steps on both “opt-out” and “opt-in” for insurance within superannuation will be significantly influence by the findings of the Productivity Commission (PC).

Responding to questioning during the Financial Services Council Leaders’ Summit in Sydney, O’Dwyer declined to give a firm view on the question of “opt-in” but said that the Government had specifically-tasked the PC with reviewing the issue.

“I will be interested to see the outcome,” O’Dwyer said.

A panel of insurance company senior executives later expressed mixed views about the minister’s announcement earlier this week that the Government had asked the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to make it easier for people to opt-out of insurance inside superannuation.

MLC Life chief customer officer, group insurance, Suzanne Smith urged a cautious approach pointing out that people did not necessarily understand the implications of opting out.

“There is no doubt that as an industry we need to do better, but you won’t solve the problem by making it too easy to opt-out,” she said.

By comparison, Metlife chief executive, Deanne Stewart said she applauded making opting out easier because it had too often been too difficult.

However, she said she believed Australia’s group insurance regime represented a world-class system which generated a basic level of protection which would not otherwise be available to the great majority of Australians.

Stewart said she believed four critical things had been identified which needed to be addressed – erosion of superannuation, claims-handling (with total and permanent disablement claims taking up to six months), product design, and member awareness and easy access.

She said she viewed easier opt-out in the context of member awareness and easy access.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by TROT on Thu, 07/27/2017 - 13:28

The Financial Services Industry should have adopted opt out not opt in. An awareness campaign on opt out would allow clients to opt out if they no longer want advice. Instead we adopted a system that every client now has to opt in. Yet again we make it harder for the people that are engaged and want to get ahead. An exemption on group is a joke. The whole Industry should have adopted opt out! I can tell you having your staff to process FDS and opt in is a huge cost to business and to the end costumer. Opt out would allow the consumer to leave at any time and be clearly informed and save a massive amount of administration burden and achieve the same outcome and I would argue a better informed as the client would feel more in control at all time.

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

3 months 3 weeks ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months ago

Michael Lovett, who left the investment firm just three months after launching its Vanguard Super offering, has taken up a chief executive role at an Australian asset man...

7 hours ago

As Australia gears up for the May budget, Treasurer Jim Chalmers has shed light on the significant global economic challenges that are shaping the nation’s fiscal decisio...

7 hours ago

A fintech leader has said that AI technologies will have profound implications for the superannuation sector....

7 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND