A shift to a “once only” default superannuation system will spark a battle for new starters, particularly an increase in direct competition, but will also impact the costs of acquisition per member for each fund, according to AustralianSuper.
In a submission to the Productivity Commission (PC) on competitiveness and efficiency of super, the industry fund said that while the increase in competition could deliver member benefits, and that it would impact system costs, the advantage of a “once only” default must be balanced by:
The submission also noted that “first timer default” system decision for employees had a danger of employees defaulting into a poor performing fund and member disengagement could be perpetuated.
“Research indicates that the majority of first time job starters do not actively choose their own superannuation fund. If members continue to be disengaged this default has lifelong implications and potentially more damaging than current shortcomings of the system,” the submission said.
“Consequently, it is essential that there is a significantly rigorous selection process for eligible default funds based on long term net investment performance.”
AustralianSuper said issues that would need to be addressed were:
AustralianSuper also urged the PC to conduct a full cost benefit analysis of any recommendation to understand and assess the costs, benefits, and risks associated with any alternative default arrangement.
It said that any change to the current default arrangements should only be undertaken when there was confidence that the changed system would work better for defaulting members.
There is a need for Australia’s superannuation funds to simplify their investment menus, according to the firm, given over a third of funds have more than 30 options, of which one or more are “arguably subscale”.
The research house is set to offer research ratings of superannuation funds for the first time amid growing demand from financial advisers.
Treasury is calling for submissions on its draft regulations in relation to the calculation of the proposed Division 296 tax.
Initially intended to offer a “simple, cost-effective” option for Aussies invested in default fund options, a super consultant has weighed in on what the scheme has actually done for members.
Add new comment