Costello well off the mark says ASFA

17 October 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has accused former Liberal Federal Treasurer, Peter Costello of effectively seeking to nationalise the superannuation industry.

The ASFA chief executive, Dr Martin Fahy dismissed Costello’s suggestion that the private superannuation savings of Australians should be diverted to a government-run investment fund and administrator.

Fahy said there would be significant problems with the proposal put forward by Costello, who is now the chair of the Future Fund.

“What is being proposed is in essence the nationalisation of private, individual superannuation savings,” the ASFA CEO said. The Future Fund effectively operates as the Australian Government’s wholesale investment manager. However, it lacks the required governance framework and administrative capabilities needed for it to operate in a superannuation context.”

“Broadening the role of the Future Fund – from managing money to meet public liabilities to also managing private superannuation assets – would represent an erosion of the trustee and investment governance frameworks critical to the delivery of member returns,” Fahy said.

It would also increase political risk for the Future Fund and the government, and risk heightening market or member perceptions that savings are underwritten by the government.

“Given its purpose, the Future Fund does not offer vital group insurance coverage that protects Australians in times of personal crisis, nor does it have the capability to do so,” he said.

“Mr Costello’s proposal would also require the government to set up and operate a centralised facility to undertake administration functions for the government-run fund. Effectively, this would see administration services for many member accounts transferred from private sector operators to a government administrator.”

“Australia’s private superannuation administrators have a long track record of generating efficiency improvements and providing prudent, reliable services to members,” Fahy said. “Entrusting administration to a government-run entity would reverse significant efficiency gains delivered through the government’s SuperStream program, which sets very high standards for private administrators.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 1 week ago

Blue Owl Capital, a US asset manager with its eye on ‘marquee investors’ like super funds, has announced the appointment of a senior Future Fund executive as its newest m...

1 day 7 hours ago

Australia’s second-largest super fund has confirmed it is expanding its presence in the UK following significant investment in the region....

1 day 23 hours ago

While the Financial Advice Association Australia said it supports a performance testing regime “in principle”, it holds reservations about expanding this scope to retirem...

1 day 13 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND