FSC claims union super revenue motives

6 October 2015
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The Financial Services Council (FSC) has sought to back its calls for changes to superannuation fund governance arrangements by claiming that some union officials are blocking fund mergers to protect union revenue streams.

In a submission to the Senate Economics Committee inquiry into the Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Trustee Governance) Bill 2015 the FSC specifically pointed to the failed merger between Equipsuper and VisionSuper.

It said that Equipsuper and Vision Super were finalising a merger to create a $10 billion superannuation fund with 160,000 members and the two super funds had been in merger talks for three years and undertaken expensive due diligence.

"The merger was scheduled to be complete in July 2012," the FSC submission said.

"On the eve of the merger, however, Equipsuper pulled out. Equipsuper's chair, Andrew Fairley, publicly cited Vision Super's sponsoring unions' and employer organisations' inability to reach agreement on the number of seats each would receive on the board of the merged entity as the major roadblock to the merger.

"Board seats are an important source of revenue and influence to sponsoring organisations. In many instances the salary paid to the board member is paid back to the sponsoring organisation and helps fund their day-to-day activities. Sponsoring organisations therefore have an incentive to put their own interests ahead of the interest of the fund member.

"Unfortunately for consumers, the current board composition of superannuation funds is preventing consolidation and can inhibit achieving economies of scale.

"Independent directors would be expected to take a critical look at the operating costs of subscale funds and assess whether those funds are viable over the longer term. Whilst it should be expected that all trustee directors would undertake such analysis, there are examples of directors of superannuation funds putting the interests of their sponsoring organisation ahead of the interests of consumers."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 1 week ago

Blue Owl Capital, a US asset manager with its eye on ‘marquee investors’ like super funds, has announced the appointment of a senior Future Fund executive as its newest m...

1 day 14 hours ago

Australia’s second-largest super fund has confirmed it is expanding its presence in the UK following significant investment in the region....

2 days 6 hours ago

While the Financial Advice Association Australia said it supports a performance testing regime “in principle”, it holds reservations about expanding this scope to retirem...

1 day 20 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND