Grattan Institute mistake remain uncorrected – FSC

29 September 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Public commentary on the default superannuation market has been largely focused on a flawed assessment of Chile’s competitive auction model conducted by the Grattan Institute which has never admitted its mistake, according to Financial Services Council senior policy manager, Blake Briggs.

Writing on a column to be published in the next print edition of Super Review, Briggs has pointed to the current review being undertaken by the Productivity Commission and the degree to which the Grattan Institute assessment has continued to be a factor,

“… the market has unfortunately focused on a proposal of the Grattan Institute for a competitive tender model – one that is deeply flawed and based on poor evidence,” he said.

“Chant West demonstrated in 2014 that Grattan’s assessment of potential cost savings from Chile’s competitive auction model was wrong. It compared Chile’s administration fees only with the sum of Australia’s administration and investment fees for MySuper Products. Grattan has never admitted its mistake, and has continued to advocate for the flawed tender model,” Briggs said.

At the same time as advocating further competition in the compulsory superannuation market and welcoming the Productivity Commission’s suggestion of a “no default” baseline for discussion purposes, Briggs argued that the current review should not delay the Government acting to reactivate legislative proposals which lapsed with the calling of the recent Federal Election.

“Reforms introduced to parliament prior to the 2016 election lapsed when parliament was prorogued, including a requirement for trustees to appoint independent directors and measures to extend the right to choose a superannuation fund to all consumers” he said.

“It is appropriate and advantageous to consumers for the Government to action these reforms whilst the PC review is underway. After all, a 2020 ‘health check’ would only be meaningful in an environment where new consumer protections are in place and all APRA-approved MySuper products have been allowed to compete on a level playing field."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 1 week ago

Blue Owl Capital, a US asset manager with its eye on ‘marquee investors’ like super funds, has announced the appointment of a senior Future Fund executive as its newest m...

15 hours ago

Australia’s second-largest super fund has confirmed it is expanding its presence in the UK following significant investment in the region....

1 day 7 hours ago

While the Financial Advice Association Australia said it supports a performance testing regime “in principle”, it holds reservations about expanding this scope to retirem...

22 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND