There is nothing to stop superannuation funds from directing asset allocations towards so-called “impact investments” but, ultimately, they are only likely to do so if they believe it is in the best interests of their members.
That is the bottom line of an Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) submission responding to a Federal Treasury discussion paper on social impact investing.
The submission has effectively countered suggestions that the sole purpose test might preclude impact investments on the part of superannuation funds, but points out that trustees are likely to take a highly pragmatic approach.
“ASFA considers that the current legislative framework for superannuation funds is not a barrier to superannuation funds investing in impact investments,” the submission said but pointed out that trustees clearly understood that their primary purpose was to “deliver retirement savings to fund members”.
The submission said there were barriers to superannuation funds investing in impact investment assets with some of those barriers relating to the inherent nature of markets that are in the early stages of development.
It said the main barriers to superannuation funds investing in impact investment assets included:
Australia’s second-largest super fund has explained its approach to the Asian giant and how it is balancing underlying risk, adding that avoiding China altogether may not be a “doable strategy”.
New research indicates that industry superannuation funds are poised for significant growth, posing a challenge to traditional active managers.
Challenger reported growth of 190 per cent in lifetime annuity sales, having realised an “extraordinary” opportunity in retirement.
The ethical asset manager has launched an infrastructure debt fund in association with specialist manager Infradebt.
Add new comment