Adverse publicity drive insurance opt-outs

31 August 2017
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

The increased publicity around insurance within superannuation saw an upsurge in members opting out such arrangements, according to evidence provided to the Productivity Commission (PC) by Mercer.

The Mercer submission to the PC’s inquiry into Superannuation Industry Competitiveness and Efficiency revealed a surge in the numbers of members opting out, particularly 35 to 44-year-olds.

The Mercer submission strongly reinforced for the value of insurance within superannuation and noted the arguments which had been mounted against the arrangements, including suggestions that it be change to an “opt-in” arrangement.

The submission utilised membership data from the Mercer Super Trust and determined that about 12.3 per cent of members had either opted out of insurance within super representing 21,000 of the fund’s 170,312 eligible members.

Discussing the surge in opt-outs experienced in 2016, the submission said the significant number had been driven by media coverage relating to insurance within superannuation.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Submitted by The Great GL R… on Wed, 09/20/2017 - 13:50

Members are just getting smart to the 'The Great GL Ripoff' and how these excessive premiums (which have increased numerous times over the past few years) are really eating into their final balances.
As an example, my wife who has mid level Death and TPD cover through superannuation and works 25 hours per week is losing 42% of her SG contributions to monthy GL premiums.
I strongly believe insurance cover should be totally removed from superannuation and really don't believe the pundits who say that this is giving protection to those who would normally not have cover like low wage earners and the less educated. Those same people are the ones whom are less likely to be engaged in their super or even know that they are paying these premiums or make a know they can make a claim when the time arises.
If you want insurance cover pay for it outside of super.
Another beef I have regarding insurance cover in super is, how on earth can members be allowed to cover themselves for as much cover as they want (over a million dollars cover if you choose) and this is 100% payed for by employer SG contributions, if the member is not making personal contributions . I am sure it wasn't Paul Keating's vision when he created superannuation for a large portion of SG contributions to be going into the pockets of these large insurers the like of TAL, CommInsure ING etc etc, etc
The government should be deeply concerned about this fact or they will end up having to cough up billions more to fund pensions for those who simply don't have enough in super.

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

3 months 3 weeks ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months ago

Michael Lovett, who left the investment firm just three months after launching its Vanguard Super offering, has taken up a chief executive role at an Australian asset man...

13 hours ago

As Australia gears up for the May budget, Treasurer Jim Chalmers has shed light on the significant global economic challenges that are shaping the nation’s fiscal decisio...

13 hours ago

A fintech leader has said that AI technologies will have profound implications for the superannuation sector....

13 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND