18 months of data reveals what Best in Show looks like

30 August 2019
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

If the Federal Government decided to adopt the Productivity Commission’ s recommendation of a “best in show” approach to the selection of default funds, then only around four major funds could be regularly expected to appear on the list of Top 10 funds.

That is the bottom line of analysis which Super Review took into August’s Future of Superannuation Event in Melbourne utilising FE/Fundinfo’s data analytics capabilities.

The analysis covered which funds would have made it onto a “best in show” superannuation top 10 across three six month periods – December 2017, June 2018 and December 2018.

It found that only two of the major funds made it onto the Top 10 list for all three periods –  Statewide Super and SunSuper, while the largest industry superannuation fund AustralianSuper only made it into the list for two of the three periods examined.

The data presented to the Future of Superannuation Conference followed on from Super Review in March publishing the Top 15 superannuation funds utilising the FE/Fundinfo’s quantitative Crown Ratings analysis to determine which had plotted the steadiest investment return path in terms of their listed investments.

The best performing funds under the Crown Ratings system are those that prioritise consistency.

The ratings are based on alpha, volatility, and consistency and strength of performance measured across the three years prior to each six-monthly rebalancing.

Specifically, the ratings identify funds that have displayed superior performance in terms of stock-picking, consistency of outperformance against a credible benchmark, and achievement of results at relatively low risk.

The top 10 per cent are rewarded with five Crowns, the next 15 per cent four Crowns.

Thus, those superannuation funds who made it onto the Top 10 lists which were revealed at the Future of Super event were those which had the most consistently performing listed allocations.

A panel discussion accompanying the data at the conference agreed that it exemplified the challenges which would accompany any attempt to develop a workable Top 10 default list.

The panel also agreed that such an approach risked inflicting considerable damage on those funds which failed to make such a shortlist.

The Productivity Commission report proposed the development of a short list of funds most likely to provide good member outcomes and which support safe and simple employee choice.

According to the PC, rivalry to be on that best in show list would create an ongoing dynamic of competition.

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

4 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months 1 week ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months 1 week ago

The property group, owned by industry super fund Aware Super, has announced two new projects with a total construction value of $320 million that will add more than 700 h...

16 hours 24 minutes ago

A member of the super fund has approached ASIC to investigate potentially misleading or deceptive representations by UniSuper regarding the holdings of its sustainable po...

17 hours 33 minutes ago

The median growth fund delivered 1.9 per cent in March, adding to the “stunning” rally that has seen super funds gain 11 per cent since November....

23 hours 9 minutes ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND