Emulation funds may be no better than those they track, once the opportunity cost of missed short-term returns is factored in, research has found.
The funds promise lower costs for multi-manager funds by reducing trading activity and delaying trading decisions by individual fund managers.
But the gain in cost-saving is often offset by the loss of short-term trading profits, according to the Capital Markets Cooperative Research Centre (CMCRC), which tracked the funds over four years.
“One of the biggest pitfalls of emulation is that it fails to exploit the short-lived information value of the original trade signal,” Zhe Chen, CMCRC PhD Candidate from the Macquarie Graduate School of Management said.
“This leads to significant losses that appear to outweigh the benefits of reduced transaction costs.”
However, the research found emulation funds could be more beneficial given a longer lag, with the gains from lower transaction costs more likely to amount to real savings over an extended period of time.
While the latest quarterly CPI print exceeded expectations, most economists still anticipate a rate cut, especially amid growing downside risks to global growth stemming from uncertainty around US tariffs.
With concerns that the expansion efforts of fossil fuel giants are still largely unchecked by Australian super funds, Market Forces is urging tougher action.
Despite calming moves from the US administration and reassurances at the IMF and World Bank spring meetings, the global economy remains on a precarious footing, according to a new analysis by Barclays.
A former adviser to superannuation trustees has sounded the alarm on what he describes as “serious deficiencies” within the system, urging regulators to take immediate action.