The Financial Systems Inquiry should actively consider the introduction of an “adequacy benchmark” to inform Australians of how well they are prepared for retirement, according to Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees (AIST) policy adviser Karen Volpato.
Addressing the Super Review Post-Retirement and Ageing Forum in Sydney today, Volpato acknowledged that such an “adequacy benchmark” represented a central element of the AIST submission to the Financial Systems Inquiry and said she believed there needed to be a nationally-accepted definition of retirement incomes adequacy.
She said this was needed in circumstances where superannuation fund members most commonly wanted to know how much super they actually had and how much it would actually get them in retirement.
Volpato said that the bottom line was that while Australia had developed an almost incomparable system with respect to the accumulation of superannuation, it needed to move to appropriately develop a post-retirement regime.
In doing so, she said Government and the industry needed to also take account of health and welfare issues associated with the ageing.
Australian retirees could increase their projected annual incomes between 3 and 51 per cent by incorporating personal and household data into their retirement income strategies, according to new research.
The best interests duty and new class of adviser didn't make the cut for the pre-election DBFO draft bill; however, ASFA has used its submission to outline what it wants to see from the final package.
The peak body stressed that the proposed financial advice reforms should “pass as soon as possible” and has thrown its weight behind super funds providing a greater level of advice.
Economists from the big four banks have all predicted the RBA to deliver another rate cut during its July meeting; however, some admit the decision will be a close call.