ASIC fine-tunes clearing house regulation

9 May 2007
| By Glenn Freeman |

Superannuation clearing houses have been classified as financial product providers for the purposes of the Corporations Act, according to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

Because they are facilities through which non-cash payments (NCP) are made, superannuation clearing houses and other electronic payment facilities have been captured under the existing licensing, conduct and disclosure provisions of the Corporations Act.

This means that superannuation clearing houses not already in possession of the appropriate Australian Financial Services Licence must meet this requirement “as soon as reasonably practicable”.

ASIC Policy Statement 185 Non-cash payment facilities also states that providers must comply with the relevant disclosure requirements such as providing members with a Product Disclosure Statement (PDS).

It defines a superannuation clearing house as a service provided to an employer whereby the employer distributes or forwards superannuation contributions to an employee’s chosen superannuation fund.

According to ASIC director of regulatory policy and research Mark Adams: “ASIC considers that superannuation clearing houses and electronic payment facilities are ordinarily financial products for the purposes of the Corporations Act because they are facilities through which non-cash payments can be made.

“Accordingly, in most cases, ASIC expects providers of superannuation clearing houses and electronic payment facilities to comply with the licensing and disclosure provisions of the Corporations Act.”

ASIC’s general policy on how it would regulate NCP facilities was published in November 2005 in PS 185. This did not explicitly deal with superannuation clearing houses, but determined that a fact-find would be completed to better understand their operation.

PS 185 also includes the factors that ASIC will consider in determining eligibility for individual or class order relief.

On a case-by-case basis, these criteria will be applied under exemption and modification powers contained in either chapter seven of the Corporations Act, ASIC’s general policy on granting relief from either general licensing, or product disclosure requirements or those specific to NCP facilities.

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 4 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 4 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 4 months ago

A major super fund has defended its use of private markets in a submission to ASIC, asserting that appropriate governance and information-sharing practices are present in...

2 days 9 hours ago

A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets....

3 days 6 hours ago

While the latest quarterly CPI print exceeded expectations, most economists still anticipate a rate cut, especially amid growing downside risks to global growth stemming ...

3 days 6 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND