ASIC fine-tunes clearing house regulation

9 May 2007
| By Glenn Freeman |

Superannuation clearing houses have been classified as financial product providers for the purposes of the Corporations Act, according to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

Because they are facilities through which non-cash payments (NCP) are made, superannuation clearing houses and other electronic payment facilities have been captured under the existing licensing, conduct and disclosure provisions of the Corporations Act.

This means that superannuation clearing houses not already in possession of the appropriate Australian Financial Services Licence must meet this requirement “as soon as reasonably practicable”.

ASIC Policy Statement 185 Non-cash payment facilities also states that providers must comply with the relevant disclosure requirements such as providing members with a Product Disclosure Statement (PDS).

It defines a superannuation clearing house as a service provided to an employer whereby the employer distributes or forwards superannuation contributions to an employee’s chosen superannuation fund.

According to ASIC director of regulatory policy and research Mark Adams: “ASIC considers that superannuation clearing houses and electronic payment facilities are ordinarily financial products for the purposes of the Corporations Act because they are facilities through which non-cash payments can be made.

“Accordingly, in most cases, ASIC expects providers of superannuation clearing houses and electronic payment facilities to comply with the licensing and disclosure provisions of the Corporations Act.”

ASIC’s general policy on how it would regulate NCP facilities was published in November 2005 in PS 185. This did not explicitly deal with superannuation clearing houses, but determined that a fact-find would be completed to better understand their operation.

PS 185 also includes the factors that ASIC will consider in determining eligibility for individual or class order relief.

On a case-by-case basis, these criteria will be applied under exemption and modification powers contained in either chapter seven of the Corporations Act, ASIC’s general policy on granting relief from either general licensing, or product disclosure requirements or those specific to NCP facilities.

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 6 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 6 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 6 months ago

The super fund’s Future Saver High Growth option delivered an 11.9 per cent return for the financial year 2024–25, on the back of a diversified portfolio and actively man...

57 minutes 57 seconds ago

HESTA has delivered a 10.18 per cent return for its MySuper Balanced Growth option in the 2024–25 financial year, marking the third consecutive year of returns above 9 pe...

3 hours ago

Sally McManus, secretary of the Australian Council of Trade Unions (ACTU), commented on the proposal after former prime minister Paul Keating took a swipe at the current ...

7 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
92.15 3 y p.a(%)
3