The Financial Services Council (FSC) has acknowledged that the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC’s) recent review of vertically integrated institutions and conflicts of interest shows that community and regulator concerns about the quality of financial advice in Australia remain valid.
ASIC’s review of 200 files showed that 130 did not meet the regulator’s record-keeping standards, with 19 being concerning enough to warrant ASIC working with the individual licensees to compensate clients.
The FSC questioned ASIC’s methodology in completing the reviews. ASIC considered file documentation alone in making their findings, while the FSC said that the client and adviser should be consulted before drawing definitive conclusions on the appropriateness of advice.
While there have already been reform to the industry to try and improve the quality of advice, such as the Future of Financial Advice reforms, the Council acknowledged that the review proved that more work needed to be done.
The FSC said that it looked forward to working with ASIC on its proposal to introduce more transparent public reporting on approved product lists.
Australian retirees could increase their projected annual incomes between 3 and 51 per cent by incorporating personal and household data into their retirement income strategies, according to new research.
The best interests duty and new class of adviser didn't make the cut for the pre-election DBFO draft bill; however, ASFA has used its submission to outline what it wants to see from the final package.
The peak body stressed that the proposed financial advice reforms should “pass as soon as possible” and has thrown its weight behind super funds providing a greater level of advice.
Economists from the big four banks have all predicted the RBA to deliver another rate cut during its July meeting; however, some admit the decision will be a close call.