The Australian superannuation industry needs to get its house in order on key policy issues or risk having it done by someone else, according to Association of Superannuation Funds Australia (ASFA) chairman and TAL chief executive, Jim Minto.
Opening the ASFA conference in Melbourne, Minto said the industry could not afford to wait to get its house in order in circumstances where there was an obligation to deliver on public policy objectives and to recognise that competition should not be allowed to get in the way of members' best interests.
"Being the beneficiaries of public policy comes with a price," he said.
Minto said that unless the industry delivered on its obligations it would ultimately be held to account by the Government.
"We are being held to account now and we will be held to account more in the future," he said.
"There is much to do and we need to step up and control the issues."
Minto said that while competition was important to the industry, it was not something that should be pursued at the expense of members.
"We compete, but we must remember that members come first," he said.
Australian retirees could increase their projected annual incomes between 3 and 51 per cent by incorporating personal and household data into their retirement income strategies, according to new research.
The best interests duty and new class of adviser didn't make the cut for the pre-election DBFO draft bill; however, ASFA has used its submission to outline what it wants to see from the final package.
The peak body stressed that the proposed financial advice reforms should “pass as soon as possible” and has thrown its weight behind super funds providing a greater level of advice.
Economists from the big four banks have all predicted the RBA to deliver another rate cut during its July meeting; however, some admit the decision will be a close call.