(October-2003) APRA audit turns up inconsistencies

29 September 2005
| By Zilla Efrat |

The Australian National Audit Office (ANAO) has identified key differences in approach between the two divisions within the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) responsible for supervising superannuation funds and other financial entities.

The differences — between the so-called Diversified Institutions Division (DID) and the Specialised Institutions Division (SID) — were revealed in a performance audit conducted by the ANAO into APRA’s supervision tabled in Parliament last month.

The bottom line of the differences found by the audit report is that superannuation funds operating within large ‘conglomerates’ have been subjected to a more lenient, consultative APRA approach than so-called specialist entities.

As a result, the ANAO is recommending the development of a standardised supervisory approach, which APRA has claimed it will be implementing.

The report suggests that the SID approach of balancing efficiency with risk was found to be generally effective in identifying exposures and underlying prudential risks and applying enforcement options.

“SID consistently applies a documented methodology for supervising super funds, whereas DID does not have a documented separate methodology for reviewing superannuation entities within financial conglomerates,” the audit report says.

“Also, SID has formalised a more systematic approach to escalating supervision and undertaking enforcement actions compared to DID’s informal consultative approach.”

The ANAO report suggests that there are a series of administrative improvements that APRA can initiate to enhance its prudential supervision of Approved Trustees and superannuation funds.

“With respect to its regulatory functions, improvements could be made to APRA’s reporting of superannuation fund’s lodgement of annual returns and risk identification and review,” the report says.

“As to operational processes, ANAO considers that improvements can be made to the timely documentation of APRA’s supervisory review of superannuation funds and the development of a standardised supervisory approach to Approved Trustees and superannuation funds.”

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 6 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 6 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 6 months ago

Australia’s largest super fund has warned APRA against implementing prescriptive governance requirements that impose conformity on super funds and dull innovation.In a re...

11 hours ago

Nuclear weapons, the ultimate symbols of destruction, are bad, unless, of course, you’re a super fund quietly growing its portfolio off the back of them....

18 hours ago

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has warned superannuation trustees to lift their game on managing fund expenditure, after identifying shortcomings i...

19 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
92.15 3 y p.a(%)
3