Questions have been raised during Senate estimates as to whether a superannuation’s fund ethical framework should be taken into account during the annual performance test.
Appearing at Senate estimates, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) was asked about the underperformance of the Christian Super fund which had a faith-based mandate excluding a range of industries.
This was likely to be significantly different to the benchmark used to measure funds during the annual performance test.
Labor Senator Anthony Chisholm asked APRA whether the regulator took this mandate into account when comparing it to the benchmark.
APRA executive member, Margaret Cole, said: “The performance test regulations emanated from Treasury, from the government. That wasn't APRA's consideration. We were the ones that implemented the test in accordance with those regulations. I'm not aware that there was anything specific in there in relation to faith-based investment”.
Senator and minister for superannuation, financial services and the digital economy, Jane Hume, added there were other ethical funds such as Australian Ethical which had passed the test and was a top-performing fund, indicating ethical framework was not automatically a hindrance to returns.
She said: “They're based on an investment benchmark, not an ethical benchmark. We don't do a faith overlay, if that's what you're asking. In all honesty, neither should we.
“Let's face it, why should we discriminate against people of faith, and say, 'It's okay for you to have an underperforming fund, but people that invest in other parts of the superannuation system get a bonus; we're going to punish you because you're of faith.' I think that's entirely unfair. Let's face it, Christian Super could quite easily have a product that isn't a MySuper product, that people could choose to go in. But MySuper products are there for default.”
Australian retirees could increase their projected annual incomes between 3 and 51 per cent by incorporating personal and household data into their retirement income strategies, according to new research.
The best interests duty and new class of adviser didn't make the cut for the pre-election DBFO draft bill; however, ASFA has used its submission to outline what it wants to see from the final package.
The peak body stressed that the proposed financial advice reforms should “pass as soon as possible” and has thrown its weight behind super funds providing a greater level of advice.
Economists from the big four banks have all predicted the RBA to deliver another rate cut during its July meeting; however, some admit the decision will be a close call.