Superannuation fund chief executives should accept responsibility for the actions of their executives and employees, according to new research conducted by Super Review.
The research, conducted during November's Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) conference in Melbourne, found the vast majority of respondents believed the buck had to stop with a super fund chief executive.
The question contained in the survey had been prompted by events before the Royal Commission into the Trade Union movement which had been told of an officer at super fund Cbus providing confidential member information to the Construction Forestry Mining and Energy Union (CFMEU).
When questioned about the transmission of the information, the super fund's chief executive, David Atkin, denied any knowledge of the event.
However more than 90 per cent of respondents to the Super Review survey, sponsored by Pillar Administration, made it clear they believed the buck had to stop in the CEO's office.
Asked whether they believed super fund chief executives should accept responsibility for the actions of their staff, 94.3 per cent of respondents answered "yes" while only 5.6 per cent were opposed to the idea.
Importantly, the majority of respondents to the survey identified themselves as being superannuation fund trustees or executives.
Taking a purely passive investment approach is leaving many investors at risk of heightened valuation risks, Allan Gray and Orbis Investments have cautioned.
Annual trimmed mean inflation saw a slight spike in April, according to data from the ABS.
Active managers say that today’s market volatility and dislocation are creating a fertile ground for selective stock picking, reinforcing their case against so-called “closet indexers”.
Platform leaders admit they’re operating under constant pressure and a persistent “state of paranoia” to keep pace with technology that is reshaping how clients access and interact with their wealth.