Investment properties are the second largest sector for investments outside superannuation and Australians face a myriad of structural risks when holding these assets, according to Rice Warner.
The research house’s latest analysis found of the $2.3 trillion total personal investments as at 30 June 2016, 40.6 per cent were invested in investment property, 44.3 per cent in cash and term deposits, 12.09 per cent in equities, and 2.1 per cent in fixed interest and loans.
Rice Warner said as Australian investors were predominantly tied to variable rate loans, any increase in rates would feed into the cost of servicing mortgages, especially for investors who were using negative gearing and hence dependent on income other than their rent to service the mortgages.
It said other structural risks for property assets included:
Rice Warner noted that allowing super to be accessed to fund housing purchase would further escalate risks.
“The combination of dilution of retirement savings and further upward pressure on property prices means such a measure would at best be counter-productive for those whom it is intended to help, and at worst would further increase the risk of the property booms in Sydney and Melbourne ending in tears,” the analysis said.
New research has shown that investing in alternative assets and using active management has, to this point, delivered strong results for Australian super funds.
Australia’s $4 trillion superannuation industry is fundamentally reshaping the nation’s external accounts, setting the stage for a more sustainable current account surplus despite weaker commodity markets.
Rest has expanded its portfolio of renewable energy infrastructure by supporting a Victorian solar farm and battery project.
Economic growth was weaker than expected, once again highlighting an economy largely sustained by population growth and government spending.