Investment properties are the second largest sector for investments outside superannuation and Australians face a myriad of structural risks when holding these assets, according to Rice Warner.
The research house’s latest analysis found of the $2.3 trillion total personal investments as at 30 June 2016, 40.6 per cent were invested in investment property, 44.3 per cent in cash and term deposits, 12.09 per cent in equities, and 2.1 per cent in fixed interest and loans.
Rice Warner said as Australian investors were predominantly tied to variable rate loans, any increase in rates would feed into the cost of servicing mortgages, especially for investors who were using negative gearing and hence dependent on income other than their rent to service the mortgages.
It said other structural risks for property assets included:
Rice Warner noted that allowing super to be accessed to fund housing purchase would further escalate risks.
“The combination of dilution of retirement savings and further upward pressure on property prices means such a measure would at best be counter-productive for those whom it is intended to help, and at worst would further increase the risk of the property booms in Sydney and Melbourne ending in tears,” the analysis said.
The structural shift towards active ETFs will reshape the asset management industry, according to McKinsey, and financial advisers will be a key group for managers to focus their distribution.
ASIC has warned that practices across the $200 billion private credit market are inconsistent and, in some cases, require serious improvement.
A surge in electricity prices has driven the monthly Consumer Price Index to its highest level in a year, exceeding forecasts.
Infrastructure well-positioned to hedge against global uncertainty, says investment chief.