There is nothing to stop superannuation funds from directing asset allocations towards so-called “impact investments” but, ultimately, they are only likely to do so if they believe it is in the best interests of their members.
That is the bottom line of an Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) submission responding to a Federal Treasury discussion paper on social impact investing.
The submission has effectively countered suggestions that the sole purpose test might preclude impact investments on the part of superannuation funds, but points out that trustees are likely to take a highly pragmatic approach.
“ASFA considers that the current legislative framework for superannuation funds is not a barrier to superannuation funds investing in impact investments,” the submission said but pointed out that trustees clearly understood that their primary purpose was to “deliver retirement savings to fund members”.
The submission said there were barriers to superannuation funds investing in impact investment assets with some of those barriers relating to the inherent nature of markets that are in the early stages of development.
It said the main barriers to superannuation funds investing in impact investment assets included:
New research has shown that investing in alternative assets and using active management has, to this point, delivered strong results for Australian super funds.
Australia’s $4 trillion superannuation industry is fundamentally reshaping the nation’s external accounts, setting the stage for a more sustainable current account surplus despite weaker commodity markets.
Rest has expanded its portfolio of renewable energy infrastructure by supporting a Victorian solar farm and battery project.
Economic growth was weaker than expected, once again highlighting an economy largely sustained by population growth and government spending.