Growth funds lose 0.5% in August

17 September 2019
| By Jassmyn |
expand image

Political uncertainty and a possible US recession hit superannuation funds in August as the median growth fund (61 to 80% growth assets) lost 0.5% in August, according to Chant West.

However, the research house said July’s 1.4% return was able to offset the loss to give a return of 0.9% over the first two months of the financial year.

Australian shares lost 2.3%, while hedged international shares fell 1.9%, but the depreciation of the Australian dollar over the month turned that loss into a small gain of 0.3% in unhedged terms.

Chant West senior investment research manager, Mano Mohankumar, said there were a handful of growth funds that made a small return in August because the typical growth fund had around 48% of its investment allocation outside of shares.

These include unlisted property and infrastructure as well as traditional defensive sectors like bonds and cash. Bonds in particular provided strong returns in August due to falling long term bond yields, which helped offset the negative returns from shares,” he said.

“They’re also perceived to be safe-haven assets in times of uncertainty, so investor demands for bonds drove up their value.”

Mohankumar noted the volatility in August was mainly due to US/China trade tensions, the possibility of a US recession, Brexit uncertainty, and disappointing economic data from Germany which was usually the most resilient of the European economies.

He also said that while the growth category was where most people had their super, a meaningful number were in “lifecycle” products.

“Most retail funds have adopted a lifecycle design for their MySuper defaults, where members are allocated to an age-based option that is progressively de-risked as that cohort gets older,” he said.

However, it was difficult to make direct comparisons of the performance of these age-based options as the traditional options that were based on a single risk category.

Mohankumar said the younger members of retail lifecycle products – those born in the 1970s, 1980s and 1990s – had slightly outperformed the MySuper Growth median over most periods. However, they had done so by taking on more share market risk.


Read more about:


Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

2 months 1 week ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

2 months 2 weeks ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

2 months 2 weeks ago

A healthy lifestyle doesn’t have to be a question of all or nothing. If you can take small, consistent steps to improve your wellbeing, then you’re on the right track. It...

1 day 5 hours ago

The $24 billion fund is now providing full-time super guarantees for part-time employees rejoining the workforce. ...

2 days 15 hours hence

New research by the Financial Services Council reveals Australians largely agree with the government’s proposed wording for the objective of superannuation towards retire...

1 day 13 hours hence