Infrastructure deficit a mirage, says Grattan Institute

5 June 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

The nation's infrastructure deficit may be an engineering mirage rather than an economic reality, Grattan Institute chief executive John Daley told an Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) luncheon.

"The only published evidence that we have been able to find of a large infrastructure deficit appears to be a long wish list of projects written by engineering and construction firms," he said.

Infrastructure Australia (IA) had not identified a series of viable projects, Daley said. It had added $15 billion to its infrastructure pipeline for the last three years — with $10 billion to be funded by IA. The remaining projects were either not viable — a fact known to IA, Daley said — or were ready to proceed with government funding.

"If you just look at road and railway spending by Australian governments over the last four or five years, you can see it is a higher percentage of GDP... than in any stage since the Australian Bureau of Statistics started to collect records in 1987," he said.

"It's not obvious to me that that five-year surge in infrastructure spending has led to the same surge in productivity — in fact quite possibly the reverse."

Of the projects to which IA gave the green light, the cost-benefit ratio was about 1.5, according to Daley. He said infrastructure projects only boosted productivity if they were in the right place at the right price, but became less profitable as a proportion of outlay and less productive as core infrastructure was completed in cities.

"Before we spend too much time arguing about whether super funds are under-investing in infrastructure, I would suggest that the onus of proof is on those who claim it to prove that there are in fact a whole series of projects waiting to be funded," he said.

A recent white paper from Industry Super Network (ISN) claimed infrastructure investment by super funds could increase productivity and lead to higher economic growth and real wages — and with market reforms could increase GDP by 2 per cent.

It said the infrastructure deficit had been estimated at $770 billion, with industry super funds planning to invest $5-15 billion in infrastructure projects over the next five years.

ISN said that if the rest of the super industry invested to the same extent, infrastructure investment could reach $100 billion.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 4 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 4 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 4 months ago

New research has shown that investing in alternative assets and using active management has, to this point, delivered strong results for Australian super funds....

21 hours 53 minutes ago

Australia’s $4 trillion superannuation industry is fundamentally reshaping the nation’s external accounts, setting the stage for a more sustainable current account surplu...

21 hours 56 minutes ago

With concerns that the expansion efforts of fossil fuel giants are still largely unchecked by Australian super funds, Market Forces is urging tougher action....

22 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND