POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
SMC defends private markets exposure, calls for 'balanced review'
As ASIC looks to crack down on private markets, the Super Members Council is calling for a “balanced review” of both its opportunities and risks.
Industry stakeholders are continuing to publish their responses to ASIC’s consultation on capital markets, following the release of its discussion paper earlier this year.
Last week, the corporate regulator’s deputy chair Sarah Court acknowledged the quality of the feedback received, describing some submissions as “really good, thoughtful and helpful”.
Court also reiterated that ASIC is not seeking to impose heavy-handed regulation on private markets but is aiming to deepen its understanding of what she called an inherently “opaque” sector.
“We’re certainly not saying we need to go heavy-handed regulation in private markets, but as private markets, private credit increases, we are concerned about the lack of transparency in those markets,” she said.
The Super Members Council (SMC) is one of the latest industry groups to publicly release its submission to ASIC. In its response, the advocacy body urged for the regulator’s review of capital markets to be “balanced in its consideration of both opportunities and risks”.
“While the discussion paper focuses on risks, it overlooks the many strong benefits of private markets,” the SMC stated.
“Our submission highlights the importance of private market investments by funds on behalf of their members and the clear benefits these investments deliver, balancing this with the risks of public markets.”
It noted superannuation funds’ longstanding investment in private markets, a type of investment that has delivered higher net returns and often lower risks than comparable listed asset classes.
“Profit-to-member superannuation funds have long pioneered investment in unlisted assets, particularly infrastructure. Analysis by Frontier Advisers for SMC shows that approximately 16.5 per cent of assets of APRA-regulated superannuation entities are invested in unlisted/private market assets such as property, infrastructure, private credit and private equity,” the SMC wrote.
“Investment by superannuation funds in unlisted asset classes has enabled higher returns, lower risk, reduced volatility and improved portfolio diversification.”
These attributes have delivered strong benefits to super fund members, it continued, as well as the country’s broader financial system.
“The role of superannuation as a powerful economic stabiliser is significant – this should have been more extensively highlighted in the discussion paper,” the body argued.
The SMC also referenced the RBA’s latest Financial Stability Review, which noted that while the super sector has historically supported financial stability, policy interventions impacting liquidity could jeopardise this.
It pointed towards fundamental system changes, such as the Coalition’s proposed early withdrawal of super for house deposits, which could put this stability and investment returns in danger.
“New analysis by Frontier Advisers finds that if current preservation rules were relaxed such that superannuation funds could no longer act as long-term investors, and were no longer able to invest in unlisted assets, net returns could be lower by 0.3 - 0.6 per cent each year.”
A 0.5 per cent reduction in net returns could decrease a member’s super balance by up to 14.1 per cent or $246,200 over their working life, the analysis also discovered.
Earlier this year, the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) chief executive Mary Delahunty warned that any increase in regulatory burden could disincentivise funds from diversifying out of listed markets.
Responding at the time of ASIC’s discussion paper release in February, Delahunty also highlighted the importance of private markets for improving diversification within super fund portfolios, and thereby “improving the reliability of long-term returns for members.”
In a brief statement to InvestorDaily in the same month, Matt Linden, executive general manager of strategy at the SMC, also emphasised the vital role of private markets in funds’ investment strategies.
“Profit-to-member super funds have long invested in unlisted assets such as roads, airports, container ports and energy grids,” Linden said.
“These assets form a crucial part of profit-to-member super funds’ investment strategies and have helped to deliver impressive long-term risk-adjusted returns for members.”
AUTHOR
Jasmine Siljic
Jasmine Siljic is a journalist at Super Review. Prior to joining SR, she also worked across other Momentum Media brands as an intern and cadet journalist. She recently completed a Bachelor of Media and Communications at Macquarie University.
Recommended for you
Global investor sentiment brightened in May, according to Bank of America’s latest Global Fund Manager Survey, as concerns about a sharp economic downturn gave way to a more optimistic outlook for a “soft landing”.
Amid a volatile month for global markets, the State Street Risk Appetite Index improved slightly to return to neutral (0.0) by the end of April, up from -0.09 the month before.
The traditional 60/40 portfolio model, long a cornerstone of diversified investment strategies, is increasingly under scrutiny as evolving economic conditions and rising market volatility prompt investors to reconsider its relevance.
As market volatility persists, some super funds are pivoting defensively, while others are strategically positioning to capitalise on emerging opportunities.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
93.34 3 y p.a(%)
2
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
36.96 3 y p.a(%)
3
GAM LSA Private Shares AU I
34.22 3 y p.a(%)
4
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF (AU)
28.89 3 y p.a(%)
5
Plato Global Alpha A
28.83 3 y p.a(%)
