Call for more mandatory training in life/risk

27 November 2018
| By Hannah |
image
image image
expand image

As most of the industry shows frustration with the incoming professionalisation regime, life risk industry veteran, Michael Molesworth, has warned that underwriters and claims assessors need to be subject to more stringent education requirements or risk community outrage.

He wrote on LinkedIn that, in light of the revelations of misconduct uncovered by the Royal Commission, the current lack of requirements for underwriters and assessors to have professional training and qualifications was stark, especially compared to the extensive requirements the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) was imposing.

“Based on the part that the underwriting and claims fraternity had in some of this misconduct, it is clear that major changes are essential and one step is to introduce mandatory professionally qualified underwriting and claims assessors where your knowledge and competency is independently measured against the requirements of your role,” he wrote.

“If consumers were aware that their crucial underwriting and claim decisions were being made by mainly unqualified assessors, their outrage would be palpable and definitely below community expectations.”

He called on the new draft Financial Services Council (FSC) Code of Practice to require underwriting and claims personnel with decision-making authority to be certified by an independent body.

Some insurers had been developing in-house assessor training courses, which Molesworth was concerned would avoid the exposure of any knowledge gaps to external scrutiny and tended to support poor or inappropriate cultures, performance and behaviours.

He also warned of the “chronically high shortage of high quality underwriting and claims assessors and [that] poaching of assessors across the industry is rife”, pointing out that when an assessor was poached, the new employer would have no independent means of determining their skills or knowledge.

As such, “poorly or semi-skilled assessors with the ‘gift of the gab’ or those who are good self-promoters or, worse still, those who are undisciplined technically, are able to achieve higher senior roles.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 8 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 9 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 9 months ago

AMP has reached an agreement in principle to settle a landmark class action over fees charged to members of its superannuation funds, with $120 million earmarked for affe...

11 hours ago

A ratings firm has placed more prominence on governance in its fund ratings, highlighting that it’s not just about how much money a fund makes today, but whether the peop...

10 hours 43 minutes ago

Australian superannuation funds have slightly lifted their hedge ratios on international equities, reversing a multi-year downward trend. ...

10 hours 58 minutes ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND