![]() |
Melinda Howes
|
The Institute of Actuaries of Australia has called for cross-disciplinary risk management teams in large financial services companies such as super funds, insurance companies and banks.
Speaking at the Risk Management Institution of Australasia conference in Sydney this week, institute chief executive Melinda Howes said there should be at least one relevantly qualified, skilled and experienced risk management professional on the board of large financial services companies.
Management teams could be strengthened by a diversity of skill sets from different professional backgrounds, Howes said.
“We see actuaries as having different and complementary skills to other risk professionals, a different way of thinking about risk, advanced risk analysis skills, and experience in dealing with boards,” she said.
Financial risk was the greatest risk factor for large financial services companies, meaning actuaries were well placed to fill such a role, she said.
“It is vitally important that risk managers have business experience, and high quality training and certification,” Howes said.
“As a professional group, actuaries are supported by strong standards to ensure the quality of their analysis and advice. These skills have been recognised by the regulatory requirement for life insurers, general insurers and health insurers to appoint an actuary to advise on their financial condition and to sign off on their risk management frameworks,” Howes said.
The modelling techniques used by actuaries were now applied to non-financial risks such as operational risk, and financial services chief risk officers were actuaries, she said.
Howes said risk management was a business critical value-add to management and boards rather than a compliance cost.
The insurance company has joined this year’s awards as a principal partner.
The $135 billion fund has transitioned away from TAL Life Insurance following an “extensive tender process”.
The $80 billion fund is facing legal action over allegedly signing up new members to income protection insurance by default without active member consent.
In a Senate submission, the Financial Services Council has once again called for further clarification that the government will assess the consumer outcomes of group insurance against the enshrined objective of superannuation.