Specialist financial services legal firm, Townsends Lawyers, has pointed to a legal case in Queensland which has brought into question the standing of self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs).
The firm has pointed to the fact that Queensland Revenue has included an SMSF and its holding trusts within a payroll tax group on the basis that they are each a business and are each controlled by individuals who control other businesses.
According to Townsends, Queensland Revenue is seeking to recover unpaid payroll tax in circumstances where the only entities within the group which have assets are the SMSF and its holding trusts.
The law firms argues that if the Queensland Revenue office is successful, then the asset protection aspect of SMSFs is likely to be materially reduced.
However, it noted that the issue of whether the Commonwealth's Superannuation Industry Supervision Act (SIS Act) over-rode state legislation had not yet been raised.
The impact of identity theft and its threat to superannuation savings were highlighted in a case that went before the Federal Court at the end of 2023.
A recent NSW Supreme Court decision is an important reminder that while super funds may be subject to restrictive superannuation and tax laws, in essence they are still a trust and subject to equitable and common law claims, says a legal expert.
New research from the University of Adelaide has found SMSFs outperformed APRA funds by more than 4 per cent in 2021–22.
The SMSF Association has made a number of policy recommendations for the superannuation sector in its pre-budget submission to the government.