Many self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) trustees appear to be slow learners if recent research produced by Partners Superannuation Services is any guide.
The research revealed that, as was the case more than a year ago, the most common breach being committed by SMSF trustees was exceeding the 5 per cent limit on in-house assets.
According to the Partners research, half of all fund breaches during 2008 related to exceeding the in-house assets rule.
Commenting on the result, Partners director Martin Murden said the problem with in-house assets stemmed in part from the fact that with investments such as shares falling in value, loans or investments expressed as a percentage of fund assets had increased.
"For example, if your fund previously had $100,000 worth of assets, a 5 per cent loan would be $5,000," he said. "However, should the value fall to $50,000, $5,000 would in effect translate to 10 per cent."
Murden said while people were often unaware of the 5 per cent restriction, others saw making loans from the fund as a cheap and easy source of business finance.
He said another key area of transgression involved making personal loans to fund members, with 25 per cent of SMSFs in breach of fund rules falling into this trap for amounts typically less than $10,000.
The impact of identity theft and its threat to superannuation savings were highlighted in a case that went before the Federal Court at the end of 2023.
A recent NSW Supreme Court decision is an important reminder that while super funds may be subject to restrictive superannuation and tax laws, in essence they are still a trust and subject to equitable and common law claims, says a legal expert.
New research from the University of Adelaide has found SMSFs outperformed APRA funds by more than 4 per cent in 2021–22.
The SMSF Association has made a number of policy recommendations for the superannuation sector in its pre-budget submission to the government.