![]() |
Self-managed super funds (SMSFs) are driving a new wave of investment in the residential property market as fears linger about sharemarket volatility in the wake of the global financial crisis (GFC), according to accountancy firm Chan & Naylor.
“Increasingly, our clients are saying they feel more comfortable with holding their retirement savings in property rather than shares,” said Chan & Naylor chief executive Sal Carrero.
“Increasing awareness of the potential of SMSFs to borrow and invest is creating new demand for residential property. It seems Australians feel comfortable with property as an investment class.”
The increasing popularity of SMSFs was partly due to the performance of super funds during the GFC, leading many Australians to ask themselves whether they could invest their own money better than their super funds, he said.
SMSFs are no longer restricted to wealthier investors, with savings of $150,000 sometimes enough to create a SMSF, he said.
“The reality is SMSFs are exceptionally tax-effective and provide options for estate planning and asset protection. However, as many as 60 per cent of current SMSFs lack the structures required to gain the full benefits,” Carrero said.
The impact of identity theft and its threat to superannuation savings were highlighted in a case that went before the Federal Court at the end of 2023.
A recent NSW Supreme Court decision is an important reminder that while super funds may be subject to restrictive superannuation and tax laws, in essence they are still a trust and subject to equitable and common law claims, says a legal expert.
New research from the University of Adelaide has found SMSFs outperformed APRA funds by more than 4 per cent in 2021–22.
The SMSF Association has made a number of policy recommendations for the superannuation sector in its pre-budget submission to the government.