The self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF) regulatory regime should not be tightened to such an extent that it acts as a barrier to entry into the sector, according to ING Australia.
In its latest submission to the Cooper Review, ING has argued that while some regulatory improvements to the SMSF sector might be justified, they should not alter the unique nature of the sector with respect to flexibility and control.
The ING submission said the company generally agreed with the chairman of the Cooper Review, Jeremy Cooper, that the SMSF sector was “in pretty good shape” with “SMSF members, on the whole, appear[ing] to be doing well in taking on a higher level of responsibility for their investment savings and achieving satisfactory net investment returns”.
The submission said that it was in this context that ING suggested retaining key features of the regulatory system as it applies to SMSFs, with some refinements to their operating environment to ensure they retain their unique qualities of flexibility and control while improving the integrity of the system.
“The challenge is to ensure that any new regulations do not have the consequence of making it too difficult or cumbersome for the trustee to execute its role or act as a barrier to entry to the SMSF market,” the submission said.
The impact of identity theft and its threat to superannuation savings were highlighted in a case that went before the Federal Court at the end of 2023.
A recent NSW Supreme Court decision is an important reminder that while super funds may be subject to restrictive superannuation and tax laws, in essence they are still a trust and subject to equitable and common law claims, says a legal expert.
New research from the University of Adelaide has found SMSFs outperformed APRA funds by more than 4 per cent in 2021–22.
The SMSF Association has made a number of policy recommendations for the superannuation sector in its pre-budget submission to the government.