Superannuation funds are bringing investment functions in-house because technology has caught up to managing alternative investments, according to Oliver Johnson, E-Front sales director.
Johnson said super funds' interest in alternative assets had been on the rise due to low returns from traditional asset classes.
Because costs were at the forefront of new legislation, funds were bringing investment expertise in-house to avoid the high costs of investing in alternatives.
He said when a fund reached a certain size in its alternative asset allocation, it made less sense to outsource the portfolio and double-up on costs, which could be expensive.
"If they were a new super fund, to start up an alternatives platform, I think they wouldn't really get past the board pushing the adviser route anymore - just because of the fees," he said.
Johnson said new technologies that could handle the increased data burden of alternatives were facilitating super funds' move to boosting internal investment expertise.
Smaller funds were also hiring an investment manager or two off the back of technology that could assist in increased transparency requirements and data to provide the reasoning behind complex investment decisions, he said.
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.
Big business has joined the chorus of opposition against the proposed Division 296 tax.