POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
APRA pushes super boards
Superannuation fund trustees have again been placed on notice by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) to address the composition of their boards.
The regulator has written to the superannuation fund boards urging them “to examine whether their board has the optimum mix of skills, capabilities and experience needed to effectively carry out its responsibilities”.
In doing so, APRA outlined the findings of its thematic review into board governance practices in the industry which covered 29 licensees of various types, sizes, ownership models and board structures.
Based on the findings of the thematic review, APRA issued a range of recommendations, including that superannuation fund (RSE) licensees should:
- consider the optimal composition of their boards in the context of their business and strategic plans;
- consider the extent to which the use of independent experts signals a skills deficiency on the board;
- have sound board renewal and succession planning processes that strike an appropriate balance between ensuring continuity and bringing in diversity and fresh perspectives; and
- develop a robust and objective board assessment process that considers the performance of individual directors, as well as the board as a whole.
Commenting on the letter sent to superannuation funds, APRA deputy chairman, Helen Rowell said robust governance practices were vital to support sound decision-making and safeguard the best interests of superannuation members.
“The standard of RSE governance is improving, but boards have more work to do,” she said. “The recommendations in this review provide a clear guide to industry better practice that licensees can review their governance arrangements against, and identify areas for improvement.”
Rowell said that meeting the minimum requirements of APRA’s prudential framework was not enough.
“APRA continues to encourage RSE licensees to change their mindset from one of legal compliance to aiming to deliver the best possible outcomes for their members,” she said.
Recommended for you
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.
Big business has joined the chorus of opposition against the proposed Division 296 tax.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
90.28 3 y p.a(%)
2
GAM LSA Private Shares AU I
37.08 3 y p.a(%)
3
DomaCom Lot 21 Chellaston Road Munno Para West SA 5115 Australia
31.44 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
31.12 3 y p.a(%)
5
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
28.28 3 y p.a(%)
