Questions from a Liberal Senator have raised doubts about the use of union-based superannuation liaison officers.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has placed a question mark over the future of Union liaison officers by some industry superannuation funds pointing out that they fulfill no formally recognised role.
APRA was responding to a question on notice from Tasmanian Liberal Senator, David Bushby who had asked whether the regulator was aware of some industry funds providing funding for the superannuation liaison officers attached to particular trade unions.
The regulator said that while it was aware of the liaison officer positions their existence was not consistent with the "responsible person" definition under the prudential standards.
APRA noted however that it understood the liaison officers were involved in enhancing engagement in superannuation through direct contact and it was therefore likely their existence was not in conflict with the sole purpose test.
However, the regulator went on to indicate that the payment of the liaison officers might raise issues with respect to related party transactions and perceptions of conflict of interest.
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.
Big business has joined the chorus of opposition against the proposed Division 296 tax.