POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Are industry funds bullying and intimidating the Morrison Government?
The current industry superannuation funds campaign against Government’s Your Future, Your Super legislation could act as a catalyst for the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) taking action over breaches of the sole purpose test.
APRA has revealed that 12 funds are under scrutiny with respect to their expenditures, notwithstanding the fact that the regulator said it was not empowered to deal with Industry Funds Services (IFS) because it is an industry association.
Faced with questioning by the chair of the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Economics, Tim Wilson, APRA revealed that Wilson had already been on its case with respect to the industry funds campaign, which Wilson described as being an “effort to bully and intimidate the Government and through it the Parliament”.
“We currently have a campaign being run by an industry body on behalf of some superannuation funds and it seems like an effort to bully and intimidate the Government and, by default, the parliament of Australia,” he said. “How is that consistent with the sole purpose which is to advance the interests of members and their returns for retirement?”
APRA chair, Wayne Byres referred to earlier correspondence between APRA and Wilson and said that there was “no black and white rule on advertising”.
“You have to look at each case on its merits,” Byres said.
“We became aware of that case last week and we are looking at it. Clearly it’s a campaign by an industry association and the members of that industry association obviously contribute but we don’t directly control an industry association so we have to have a look at the circumstances by which funds decide and look at the value they extract from their participation.”
APRA deputy chair, Helen Rowell said that the regulator was engaging with the superannuation trustees who are linked to that campaign to understand the decision-making process and the analysis that was undertaken by that trustee.
She said that APRA was looking at 12 funds in terms of expenditure and that there were two or three where APRA had gone back looking for more information.
“We do not yet have all of that information so we have not yet formed a view,” she said.
Recommended for you
The lower outlook for inflation has set the stage for another two rate cuts over the first half of 2026, according to Westpac.
With private asset valuations emerging as a key concern for both regulators and the broader market, Apollo Global Management has called on the corporate regulator to issue clear principles on valuation practices, including guidance on the disclosures it expects from market participants.
Institutional asset owners are largely rethinking their exposure to the US, with private markets increasingly being viewed as a strategic investment allocation, new research has shown.
Australia’s corporate regulator has been told it must quickly modernise its oversight of private markets, after being caught off guard by the complexity, size, and opacity of the asset class now dominating institutional portfolios.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
92.15 3 y p.a(%)
2
Global X 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
53.24 3 y p.a(%)
3
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
43.15 3 y p.a(%)
4
DomaCom Shoreline North Coogee
36.26 3 y p.a(%)
5
GAM LSA Private Shares AU I
35.87 3 y p.a(%)
Pot-kettle?
Wilson has conflicts of interest questions to answer. Industry funds overwhelmingly have low and middle income earner members who don’t have access to bought political representation like Wilson offers to high income white retirees living in southern state beach communities.
Industry funds acting on behalf of members are providing alternative truth to the spin from commercial interests and their political allies.
Why don’t commercial super funds compete and provide the returns, services, lower fees and security of the industry funds?
Is it because of the fat profits they make? and it’s easier and cheap to pay for political representation to hamstring rivals? isn’t there a name for that?