POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
ASFA demands clarity on levy allocation
The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has urged for transparency on how the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) distributes and allocates levies.
ASFA noted that APRA has not published a Cost Recovery Impact Statement (CRIS), outlining when the levies are used to recover costs according to the government’s cost recovery guidelines and when they are not.
It also wants more transparency on how the costs of an activity are recovered through the levies process.
“It is regrettable that industry is once again in the position of considering proposed levy amounts without access to the level of information necessary to make an informed assessment of the level of costs the Regulators are seeking to recover,” ASFA said in a submission to the 'Proposed financial industry levies for 2014-15’ consultation paper by APRA .
In future, APRA should release a CRIS simultaneously with the release of the annual consultation paper laying out the proposed levies, and whenever there is change in activities related to cost recovery, ASFA said.
ASFA also urged self-managed super funds be subject to the per member SuperStream levy.
Although the revenue would be moderate, the total accumulated across the SMSF arena would be significant and would mean a more even distribution of the SuperStream costs across all funds, it said.
It also argued that since non-levied entities such as employers also enjoyed the benefits of SuperStream, a slice of the SuperStream component should be fulfilled from consolidated revenue.
ASFA is also unhappy the consultation paper does not specify how much money assigned to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) will be allocated to the Superannuation Complaints Tribunal.
While $11.9 million will be allocated to ASIC to cover SCT and other activities, it does not outline the specific amount for SCT.
This is in contrast to last year’s paper, which said $5.8 million will be allocated to run the SCT.
Recommended for you
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.
Big business has joined the chorus of opposition against the proposed Division 296 tax.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
93.34 3 y p.a(%)
2
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
37.15 3 y p.a(%)
3
GAM LSA Private Shares AU I
33.96 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
29.68 3 y p.a(%)
5
Plato Global Alpha A
28.73 3 y p.a(%)
