The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) wants the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) to convene an industry roundtable to enable stakeholders to work through the complexities of investment fees and costs disclosures.
In what represents a tough assessment at ASIC's efforts to deliver a class order dealing with investment fees and costs, ASFA has suggested that a one or two day workshop may be necessary to iron out the issues in debate.
"By gathering a range of appropriate industry representatives in a room, with a whiteboard and butcher's paper, and allowing sufficient time, it should be possible to work through different investment arrangement and structures, identify issues and develop solutions," ASFA has said in a submission to ASIC.
What is more it is arguing that once the problems have been dealt with by such an industry workshop, the proposed changes should be subjected to a cost-benefit analysis.
"...complying with the fees and costs disclosure regime will necessitate funds incurring significant additional costs," the ASFA submission said.
"These costs should be balanced against, and commensurate with, any benefits which are delivered to consumers. An analysis should be performed of the costs incurred compared with the benefits received and an assessment made as to the extent to which the additional costs are justified."
It said the complexity and variety of the different arrangements and structures through which investments were made created a number of difficulties in complying with the current approach and this would produce inconsistent results and lead to trustees having to incur unnecessary costs.
"By way of example, where a "superwrap" trustee invests in a managed fund this produces a different disclosure outcome when compared to any other type of trustee," it said.
"There does not appear to be a compelling policy rationale for treating platforms differently to other funds."
The ASFA submission also pointed to inconsistencies with respect to fund of funds investment, unlisted unit trusts that invest in the property market, property investment, infrastructure project investment and mandate investments in equity markets.
Volatile markets driven by shifting US tariff policy failed to rattle Australia’s superannuation system in April, with balanced options inching upward.
ASFA has urged greater transparency and fairness in the way superannuation levies are set and spent.
Labor’s re-election has reignited calls to strengthen Australia’s $4.2 trillion super system, with industry bodies urging swift reform amid economic and demographic shifts.
A major super fund has defended its use of private markets in a submission to ASIC, asserting that appropriate governance and information-sharing practices are present in both public and private markets.