ASIC, APRA urged to co-regulate superannuation

4 February 2019
| By Anastasia Santoreneos |
image
image
expand image

Commissioner Hayne has urged the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) and the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA), to co-regulate when it comes to superannuation.

He agreed with APRA’s former submission on co-regulation, and recommended that APRA, as the prudential regulator for super, be responsible for establishing and enforcing prudential standards and practices while ASIC oversee the relationship between RSE licensee, which hold Australian financial services licences, and individual consumers.

Hayne noted the current division sees ASIC’s role under the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act limited to matters of disclosure, and it falls to APRA to administer the balance of the Act.

What’s more appropriate, according to the Commissioner, is that ASIC’s role be enlarged so that APRA’s remit in respect of the SIS Act be shared with ASIC “in a way that aligns with their traditional roles and strength.”

Hayne said that providing ASIC the power to protect the interests of members would provide some consistency across the two legislative regimes that apply to RSE licensees.

“An RSE licensee holds an AFSL and in holding that licence is subject to the obligations under section 912A of the Corporations Act,” he said. “Those obligations have some general similarity with obligations imposed under section 52 (and section 52A) of the SIS Act.”

“They are also similar to the obligations imposed on RSE licensees who are authorised to offer a MySuper product under section 29VN(a) (and section 29VO) of the SIS Act. It is evident that the same conduct may give rise to breaches of all of these provisions.”

He also said that while APRA’s skills were geared to prudential regulation, enforcement was a fundamental aspect of ASIC’s work, so it would face the similar issues it currently faces in enforcing other legislation.

“For example, the covenants of RSE licensees and their directors under the SIS Act are akin to the duties that ASIC already enforces in respect of responsible entities of managed investment schemes and their officers under the Corporations Act.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

3 months 3 weeks ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

4 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

4 months ago

Michael Lovett, who left the investment firm just three months after launching its Vanguard Super offering, has taken up a chief executive role at an Australian asset man...

19 hours ago

As Australia gears up for the May budget, Treasurer Jim Chalmers has shed light on the significant global economic challenges that are shaping the nation’s fiscal decisio...

19 hours ago

A fintech leader has said that AI technologies will have profound implications for the superannuation sector....

19 hours 43 minutes ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND