The Australian Securities and Investments Commission has initiated action against industry superannuation fund, REST for false and misleading representations.
The regulator has announced the commencement of civil penalty proceedings in the Federal Court against Retail Employees Superannuation Pty Ltd (REST) for false or misleading representations made about the ability of its members to transfer their superannuation out of the Retail Employees Superannuation Trust (the fund).
ASIC is alleging that, from at least 2 March 2015 to 2 May 2018, REST made representations that discouraged, and in many cases delayed or prevented, members from transferring some or all of their funds to another superannuation fund.
It said in a statement that ASIC’s case is that these members were denied their lawful rights to superannuation portability and choice of superannuation fund, causing members to suffer financial loss. ASIC further alleges that this conduct resulted in REST retaining a higher level of funds under management than would have otherwise occurred.
Specifically, ASIC alleges REST made representations to members who made, or were considering making, full balance transfers to another fund that:
A major super fund has defended its use of private markets in a submission to ASIC, asserting that appropriate governance and information-sharing practices are present in both public and private markets.
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.