It is not appropriate for superannuation fund trustees to encourage all members to maintain insurance in circumstances where many members with inactive accounts will be better off allowing the insurance to lapse, according to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
ASIC commissioner and former industry superannuation fund chief executive, Danielle Press delivered the message as part of ASIC’s guidance around how superannuation funds should deal with the Government’s recently enacted Protecting Your Super Package legislative changes.
Press said that, similarly, trustees should not be urging all members with low-balance accounts to keep their account within the fund as this may not be in the best interests of members.
The warning is significant because it comes at a time when a number of superannuation funds have been developing communications strategies, which it part warn members about what is at risk if they fail to opt-in to insurance inside superannuation.
What is more, Press put superannuation funds on notice that ASIC would be closely monitoring communications around the legislative changes and was ready to take action if it believed members were being misled.
“How a trustee communicates with their members about the PYSP changes will give us an indication of the trustee’s commitment to members’ best interests,” she said.
ASIC yesterday pointed out the changes contained in the Protecting Your Super Package legislation including:
The lower outlook for inflation has set the stage for another two rate cuts over the first half of 2026, according to Westpac.
With private asset valuations emerging as a key concern for both regulators and the broader market, Apollo Global Management has called on the corporate regulator to issue clear principles on valuation practices, including guidance on the disclosures it expects from market participants.
Institutional asset owners are largely rethinking their exposure to the US, with private markets increasingly being viewed as a strategic investment allocation, new research has shown.
Australia’s corporate regulator has been told it must quickly modernise its oversight of private markets, after being caught off guard by the complexity, size, and opacity of the asset class now dominating institutional portfolios.
It's time to get rid of ASIC & APRA and form one regulator with less public servants and more professionals who have some knowledge of the financial services sector to be able to put in place proper and sensible reforms so that those involved understand what the system represents instead of having to listen to and read about how 'the big policeman is coming to get you' no matter whether innocent or not.
I am sure the ASIC and APRA executives will be there for the young person who falls off their jetski at high speed and becomes totally and permanently disabled but has no insurance. After all, they are so much better off because they didn't pay all those nasty "fees" in super for their insurance.