The Australian superannuation industry lacks strong-price-based competition and this is leading to higher costs and sub-optimal outcomes for members, according to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).
While ASIC may not be the primary regulator for the superannuation industry, it has used its latest Corporate Plan to make clear its view of the industry and its perception that the sector could do much better.
It has pointed to the fact the Australian funds management industry reached has $2.6 trillion in total assets in June 2015 and this has been driven in large measure by superannuation, including self managed superannuation funds (SMSFs).
"Super remains a major source of capital — now $1.93 trillion, with around 30 per cent of this held in self-managed super funds — boosting national savings, increasing the depth and liquidity of financial markets, and compelling the participation of nearly all Australians in financial markets," the ASIC Corporate Plan said.
It said the movement of savings from the banking sector to the super sector was continuing to propel growth in capital markets, including increased market-based financing.
"However, a lack of strong price-based competition in the super system is leading to higher costs and sub-optimal outcomes for members," the Plan said.
It said this, along with other factors, such as low member engagement, might lead to Australians being financially under-prepared for retirement due to the inadequacy of their retirement income.
Volatile markets driven by shifting US tariff policy failed to rattle Australia’s superannuation system in April, with balanced options inching upward.
ASFA has urged greater transparency and fairness in the way superannuation levies are set and spent.
Labor’s re-election has reignited calls to strengthen Australia’s $4.2 trillion super system, with industry bodies urging swift reform amid economic and demographic shifts.
A major super fund has defended its use of private markets in a submission to ASIC, asserting that appropriate governance and information-sharing practices are present in both public and private markets.