ATO warned on STP unintended consequences

1 August 2017
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has counselled caution with respect to implementing single touch payroll (STP) arrangements and online choice of fund procedures, warning there is considerable scope for unintended consequences.

In a submission responding to an Australian Taxation Office (ATO) consultation paper on STP and online choice of fund design, ASFA has stated: “The ATO, and by extension the Government should not underestimate the potential for unintended consequences arising from the STP – new employee commencement processes described in this consultation paper”.

It said that by combining tax file number (TFN) withholding processes with superannuation choice processes through a third-party portal (the ATO), “there is a risk that the likelihood of improved experience and greater efficiency are low”.

“A breakdown in one part of the process could affect other parts which can be avoided as each process has different time dependencies,” the submission said. “The potential unintended consequence of greatest concern from ASFA’s viewpoint is the risk that this process results in a reduction of member engagement potentially leading to sub optimal retirement or insurance benefit outcomes.”

The ASFA submission claimed that the ATO’s own usability testing had highlighted that understanding and engagement with superannuation was currently low and that individuals were likely to refer back to employers and family members for guidance.

“If the ATO process shortcuts these steps for individuals, as it is intended to do, opportunities will be missed to encourage individuals to properly assess existing superannuation accounts alongside new options that may be a greater benefit to them,” it said.

“The ATO process in isolation also has the potential to undermine the efforts and positive outcomes to date from the MySuper regime,” the submission said. “MySuper products by design and through more stringent prudential oversight are generally high quality, low cost, somewhat standardised products that individuals are allocated to if superannuation choice is not exercised. This protects the disengaged and should be fostered. Similarly, these processes may have detrimental effects on innovation in new product development and prolong moves to a lower cost, higher quality, more competitive environment.”

“As has been mentioned several times in our response, consumer and market impacts need to be tested before online choice services are provided by either the ATO or employers for use,” the ASFA submission said.

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 7 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 8 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 8 months ago

The corporate watchdog is preparing to publish a progress report on private credit this September, following a comprehensive review of the rapidly expanding market....

3 days 18 hours ago

The major superannuation fund is facing legal action from ASIC after allegedly failing to inform the regulator about investigations into serious member service issues....

3 days 20 hours ago

The regulator has commenced a targeted review to address regulatory hurdles that may be discouraging superannuation funds from investing in property assets....

4 days 18 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
74.26 3 y p.a(%)
3