(August-2001) Brownie points don’t equal super votes

31 August 2005
| By Anonymous (not verified) |

ASFA, armed with research findings and a TV ad campaign, has been doing its best to turn up the heat on both political parties in the hope of placing super firmly on the election agenda. Its research shows voters in the electorate of Moreton in Brisbane (currently held by the Liberal Party with a margin of 0.6 per cent) found that adequacy of retirement incomes is a key issue for nine out of 10 people, coming well ahead of economic topics such as the GST, tax cuts and the Budget.

Let’s hope that it isn’t just the people of Moreton, but a wider part of Australia, that are not hooked on instant gratification and do not see retirement as a long way off.

Politicians, of course, are a different breed, generally focused on holding on to their seats in the short-term, which means that the concept of taking pain now for long-term gain rings few bells for them.

ASFA CEO Philippa Smith believes that her organisation’s research identifies a clear gap for a political party willing to take the lead on the issue of retirement savings.

When questioned on which party was better at helping people save for retirement, more than 40 per cent of the Moreton-based respondents could not nominate any party.

I get the feeling, somehow, that the Government considered superannuation some time ago as an election issue and promptly buried it. It doesn’t want to highlight its track record in this area. That’s why we never heard anything more from the Government, after it hinted last year that it would review and simplify super.

Labor has grabbed the mantle and we now talk about Labor’s proposed review of super. This will earn Labor brownie points from people in the super industry, but will it lasso in broader voters?

I wonder if promising a review is a nice way of taking credit for doing something, while at the same time taking the issue out of the present and putting it out of sight until (after the election) it is safe to open up the can.

The least we can ask for is mature debate to take matters forward, and not a repeat of the handling of Shadow Treasurer Simon Crean’s recent remarks about raising SG contributions. Crean told a newspaper that he believed that the SG should be taken above nine per cent to meet adequacy on superannuation. He did not, however, discuss who would fund the rise, adding only that “the level, timing and mechanism are for our review of superannuation to determine”.

The Prime Minister immediately issued a press statement entitled “Labor slug for small business”, which claimed: “Up to 200,000 jobs would be at risk under Labor’s plan to lift the superannuation guarantee charge from nine per cent to 15 per cent”.

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 8 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 8 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 8 months ago

Australia’s superannuation sector has expanded strongly over the June quarter, with assets, contributions, and benefit payments all recording notable increases....

2 hours 50 minutes ago

The Super Members Council (SMC) has called on the government to urgently legislate payday super, warning that delays will further undermine the retirement savings of Aust...

3 hours ago

ASFA has highlighted that regulation should not be “set and forget” and calls for a modernised test to meet future needs....

3 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
74.26 3 y p.a(%)
3