Australian Greens back IFSA's parental leave super scheme

16 March 2010
| By Bill McConnell |
image
image image
expand image

John Brodgen

The Australian Greens have added their support to the position taken by the Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA) that any paid parental leave legislation tabled by the government should include superannuation payments.

Greens Senator Sarah Hanson-Young said the Federal Government’s “take-it-or-leave-it approach” to the proposed 18-week paid parental leave plan will, by itself, not deliver the support Australian families need.

“It’s great that all sides of politics now agree that a national paid parental scheme is necessary, but let’s make sure it delivers the best possible result for Australia’s mums and dads,” Hanson-Young said.

“The way to secure a speedy resolution is for the Government and the Opposition to accept a package with six months leave on the minimum wage plus super.”

The position taken by the Greens Senator is largely consistent with that taken by IFSA chief executive John Brodgen who said last week that many Australian women face a “grossly inadequate retirement” due to lower superannuation savings.

A study conducted by Rice Warner Actuaries, on behalf of IFSA, demonstrated how a choice by women to have children left most vastly disadvantaged in retirement.

Hanson-Young, the Greens spokesperson on the status of women, said the Greens have had legislation on the table since May last year to provide six months of paid parental leave plus superannuation payments, and it remained the only piece of legislation about the issue before parliament today.

The Greens’ proposed amendments include six months paid parental leave, and provision for superannuation payments with all payments set at the minimum —including incentives for business to top up payments based on existing schemes.

“We can’t afford to put off parliamentary debate on this issue, but we need to have sufficient time on the agenda to deal with paid parental leave properly, not just ramming through the government’s plan as the only possible solution,” Hanson-Young said.

“Families need six months leave plus super, and no amount of spinning from the Government will change that.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 6 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 6 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 6 months ago

Large superannuation accounts may need to find funds outside their accounts or take the extreme step of selling non-liquid assets under the proposed $3 million super tax ...

3 days 8 hours ago

Economists have been left scrambling to recalibrate after the Reserve Bank wrong-footed markets on Tuesday, holding the cash rate steady despite widespread expectations o...

3 days 8 hours ago

Institutional investors have increased their risk exposure over June amid tempered levels of market volatility....

3 days 8 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
2
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
95.46 3 y p.a(%)
5