The vast majority of Australian retirees are frugal and not the profligate double-dippers which some people have suggested, according to actuarial research house, Rice Warner.
In a recently-published analysis, Rice Warner has confirmed that the days of retirees taking and squandering lump sums are long gone, with most retirees taking an income stream and almost inevitably drawing down close to the minimum amount.
“The fact is that around 85 per cent of retirement benefits are taken as retirement income streams, mostly in account-based pensions,” the analysis said. “A large portion of lump sum benefits taken are used for savings not consumption by paying down debt or reinvesting into term deposits.”
“In fact, we have the reverse problem as many retirees are frugal with their pension payments. They are conservative in their drawdowns as they don’t participate in any form of mortality pooling and don’t want to spend their pensions too quickly and run out before they die.”
The Rice Warner analysis said that the Federal Government believed Comprehensive Income Products in Retirement (CIPRs) would address this by allowing people to increase their consumption in retirement by as much as 15 per cent and this had been promoted as a desirable outcome as more of the benefit would be used for retirement and much smaller amounts left as bequests.
The actuarial consultancy flagged that it would be shortly be releasing a report modelling the growth in draw-downs over a 15-year period and how this impacted industry cashflow.
It said the aggregate rate of drawdown was between seven and high per cent, which was only marginally higher than the expected minimum drawdown.
“Based on member demographics, the average minimum drawdown would be close to five per cent of account balance,” the analysis said.
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.
Big business has joined the chorus of opposition against the proposed Division 296 tax.