Technology and changing superannuation fund priorities has given rise to a blurring of the lines between custodians and administrators.
A: The pursuit of technology to increase their service offering and deepen their commercial relationships with client superannuation funds.
Has this pursuit of technology given rise to a cross-over between administrators and custodians?
Yes but, as yet, no one is talking about direct competition and custodians certainly don’t want to get into the business of servicing member registers .
But BNP Paribas Security Services head, David Braga, believes that the lines between administrators and custodians will become increasingly blurred as superannuation funds seek to get closer to their members and to personalise the investment relationships.
“It’s very much in the hands of the super fund members and the increasing level of personalisation,” he said.
“In the next three to five years we’re going to see a lot more in terms of investment and member record-keeping and it will depend on how funds give their members touch and feel in terms of assets which are held by the custodian.
State Street senior vice president and head of global services for Australia and New Zealand, Paul Khoury, said that while there might be some areas of convergence, it was important to remember that the custodian and administrator were working at two different positions – portfolio versus member positions.
“It is not as simple as saying there’s overlap,” he said.
“There’s dependencies on both sides but where they might converge is where we provide a data warehousing solution and the fund inputs member-level data which allows them to do member level analysis and allows them to do member-level outcomes and portfolio structures.”
However Braga and Khoury are united in their view that, right now, a clear delineation continues to exist.
“The core underlying data and the processing that is required on it will remain separated for a long time,” Braga said.
A major super fund has defended its use of private markets in a submission to ASIC, asserting that appropriate governance and information-sharing practices are present in both public and private markets.
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.