Bragg compares funds to ‘Dracula and the blood bank’

expand image

Andrew Bragg has accused super funds of wanting to maintain the status quo for profit, comparing them to “Dracula and the blood bank”. 

In a recent interview, the new shadow assistant minister for home ownership reiterated the importance of allowing Aussies access to their super for the purpose of getting onto the first home ownership ladder. 

Bragg, who is well known for his insistence on a radical overhaul of superannuation, told 3AW radio this month the Coalition will develop a policy that allows access to super for a first home deposit and enables an increase in the supply of homes. 

Responding to questions regarding the policy’s possible inflationary impact on the price of houses, Bragg accused the superannuation funds of running a scare campaign. 

“The super funds are against this, so they’ve commissioned dodgy modelling which says that it will massively inflate the prices, but [for] most of the independent economists, they would have a marginal impact or no impact at all,” the shadow minister said. 

“Obviously, there’s a lot of vested interest against this policy because, of course, the super funds earned $30 billion in fees each year, and so they love the status quo where everyone’s money is locked up for 40 years and they can charge high fees on it like Dracula and the blood bank. But the reality is that for an older millennial, let’s say, 38-year-old Millennial, they have an average balance of about $90,000. In a market like Melbourne, that would do a lot of the heavy lifting towards a deposit.”

Arguing that “the key determinant of your success in retirement is not your super balance, it’s your [home] ownership status”, Bragg said the Coalition wants to make sure younger generations “can get into a home”.

“That’s going to provide more shelter and more security than a superannuation fund,” he said. 

“I think that there will be more pushback on this perverse situation that super can invest in any house except for your own. And that is a perverse rule in a country which believes in first home ownership or believes in home ownership. We’ve always had a system where people could have a house of their own, and the super system was introduced at a time when people mainly did own their own house, but now we’re seeing a decline in home ownership among Millennials and younger people.”

Earlier this year, Bragg called for a new Financial System Inquiry (FSI) to expose and remedy significant “structural issues” that pose risks to the nation’s economic standing, job market, and innovation.

This review, he noted, would also test the influence the superannuation system has on the economy, tax considerations, and housing challenges. 

The last FSI occurred almost a decade ago and is considered by some as instrumental in recommending reforms that significantly shaped Australia’s financial landscape.


Add new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

5 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

5 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

5 months ago

The newly created role comes amid the fund’s ambitions to be a ‘merger partner of choice’ in the superannuation industry....

11 hours ago

Iress has issued an update denying the validity of “certain statements” made today by an alleged threat actor....

3 days 10 hours ago

The research house has offered a silver lining after super fund returns saw the end of a five-month streak last month....

4 days 10 hours ago