POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Call for fund managers to charge flat fee
A letter sent out to about 500 fund managers has suggested that they change their fee models to better align interests between investors and fund managers, as unskilled managers currently benefit disproportionately in market growth.
Frontier Investment Consulting managing director Fiona Trafford-Walker suggested that managers change their fee models so they are paid a “flat-dollar fee, with an annual inflation ratchet”, that goes towards covering the fund manager’s business costs. Thereafter, should the fund perform well, they would receive a performance-based fee.
Trafford-Walker said the most common fee structure is that fund managers are paid based on assets under management. She said the problem with this fee structure is that there is often little correlation with the returns to the client.
“Under this structure, fund managers benefit disproportionately as the market goes up but also see revenues fall substantially as the market does,” she stated in the letter.
Trafford-Walker added that she does not accept the argument that the costs to fund managers in managing larger portfolios rise as strongly as costs paid by the client.
She said a negative for fund managers in using this model is that when markets fall, staff are often laid off to recover costs, leaving remaining managers fearful of losing their jobs rather than focusing on managing portfolios, while also having to cope with reduced resources. Ultimately, it is the client who is disadvantaged.
“The reality of a rising market is that many managers generate large fees from general market growth rather than actually delivering outperformance for clients,” Trafford-Walker said. “Poorly performing managers can go on for some years with no excess returns but still make lots of money for themselves and none for the client above an index return.”
She said poor markets expose these people, yet a change in the model to a flat fee to cover costs and a performance fee to actually reward performance would be an attractive proposition to skilled managers, who could actually earn more under such a fee structure.
AUTHOR
Caroline Munro
Recommended for you
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.
Big business has joined the chorus of opposition against the proposed Division 296 tax.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
93.34 3 y p.a(%)
2
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
37.15 3 y p.a(%)
3
GAM LSA Private Shares AU I
33.96 3 y p.a(%)
4
Fidante Credit Suisse Global Private Equity
29.68 3 y p.a(%)
5
Plato Global Alpha A
28.73 3 y p.a(%)
