The Federal Government should legislate to remove regulatory barriers which impede product innovation in the post-retirement space, particularly with respect to annuity-type products, according to new research released by the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA).
The research, released this week, claims the current governing legislation, Superannuation Industry (Supervision) (SIS) regulations, “are very focused on post-retirement products that are currently in the market, and severely limit the scope for innovation and new products”.
“New supportive regulations should set out general requirements which are not linked to specific products, such that it is a principles-based framework,” the ASFA research analysis said.
“The regulation of income streams has, to date, remained dependent on individual product characterisation (for example, account-based, lifetime, residual capital value) rather than one set of acceptable principles for income streams (that is, regular drawdown regardless of whether payments commence immediately or at a future point of time),” it said.
The ASFA analysis said such product-based characterisations drove legislative difficulty in arriving at a consistent view and treatment of different types of income streams.
“This issue is clearly demonstrated through the classification (or lack thereof) of deferred and variable annuities in the context of SIS legislation and regulations and the tax law.”
The analysis said deferred annuities were one example of an innovative product solution, but there were many other potential products and solutions and that, accordingly, any regulatory barriers which impeded product innovation and the development of longevity risk solutions to consumers should be removed.
“In particular, the regulations should permit products which offer a deferred benefit, by ensuring that deferred annuities and like products are:
- mitigate longevity risk, but aren’t necessarily lifetime guarantees
- are paid for incrementally
- are reversible to the extent that any remaining assets are available, but the 'longevity premiums’ paid to date are not
- are linked to an allocated pension and form a back-to-back contract for the investor, thereby providing a single income stream.
A major super fund has defended its use of private markets in a submission to ASIC, asserting that appropriate governance and information-sharing practices are present in both public and private markets.
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.