POWERED BY MOMENTUM MEDIA
Competitive forces effective for improving governance issues, says AustralianSuper
Australia’s largest super fund has warned APRA against implementing prescriptive governance requirements that impose conformity on super funds and dull innovation.
In a recent submission to APRA’s Governance Review, the super fund said that any reforms arising from the review should be directed towards enhancing the effectiveness of directors, rather than simply increasing compliance obligations.
APRA released its Governance Review consultation back in March that outlined eight proposals aimed at improving governance practices among superannuation funds and other entities it regulates.
AustralianSuper said that the primary responsibility for good governance, prudent risk management, and accountability should reside with the board and senior management of an entity.
The fund said it supported APRA’s longstanding principles-based approach to the prudential framework for the industry as a whole.
“Principles-based governance maintains strong outcomes while allowing for diversity of practice according to the size, business activity and strategic requirements of the institutions being supervised,” it said.
“Diversity of practice is an important feature of the Australian superannuation system which has led to a degree of innovation and competition in Australia that is not seen in pension systems in comparable countries around the world.”
The super fund said that competition was a powerful discipline on boards to continually improve their governance arrangements, as good governance leads to better outcomes for members.
“Competition and the ongoing need to invest in improved systems, continues to drive funds to strengthen risk management and deliver better services to members. An environment of increased superannuation industry consolidation has increased these positive competitive forces, as funds position themselves to navigate a future of significant opportunity, where it is clear that success will be achieved only by those funds that consistently deliver for their members,” the submission said.
“AustralianSuper would caution APRA not to use this Governance Review in a misguided way to deal with old problems which are more appropriately addressed through these competitive forces and the regulator’s existing supervisory powers.”
AustralianSuper said it would be unfortunate if the review were to result in an overly prescriptive approach to governance.
“Maintaining a principles-based approach supports both the independence of the sector and the accountability of boards for delivering strong outcomes to members, while ensuring the regulatory framework promotes competition and remains flexible, adaptive, and focused on substance over form,” it said.
“We believe that any reforms arising from this review should be directed towards enhancing the effectiveness of directors, rather than increasing compliance obligations for their own sake.”
The super fund specifically raised concerns about APRA’s proposal to impose mandatory term limits on all directors without exception, saying that this may undermine the value and skill of experienced directors.
“Imposing mandatory term limits on non-executive directors is a blunt approach to regulating governance which potentially focuses on individual directors at the expense of considering the Board as a whole,” it said.
“It undermines the value that skilled and experienced directors with deep institutional knowledge can bring to ensuring the best outcomes for members.”
If APRA does proceed with a tenure limit, AustralianSuper said the limit should not be less than 12 years, consistent with current APRA guidance.
“Importantly, funds should have the ability to extend a director’s tenure beyond 12 years in exceptional circumstances,” it said.
It also warned APRA that mandating detailed, technical, and role-specific skill sets for every individual director would risk diminishing the collective capability of the board by skewing decisions to those directors with recognised skills on a particular subject and marginalising other directors.
“We consider the relevant expertise of directors on particular subjects needs to be well balanced with the collective responsibility of the board as a whole,” it said.
The super fund said while it supports proposals to raise minimum standards for directors and boards, the right balance needed to be struck so that focusing on individual director skills does not undermine the capacity of the board to work effectively together.
“We reiterate AustralianSuper’s support for the importance of a board’s collective competence per the SIS Act and suggest APRA avoids unintended disqualification of otherwise fit directors through formulaic skills assessments,” it said.
“Skills matrices should remain entity-specific and flexible to reflect strategic evolution, rather than codified into overly rigid categories.”
Recommended for you
Nuclear weapons, the ultimate symbols of destruction, are bad, unless, of course, you’re a super fund quietly growing its portfolio off the back of them.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has warned superannuation trustees to lift their game on managing fund expenditure, after identifying shortcomings in how some funds justify spending decisions under the best financial interests duty.
Treasurer Jim Chalmers says the best defence against global economic uncertainty is a more productive economy and a more sustainable budget.
Just before Israel’s strike on Iran and the US bombing over the weekend, institutional investors were reporting their strongest improvement in sentiment for 2025 so far, according to Bank of America, as concerns over trade wars and recession risks had begun to ease.
TOP PERFORMING FUNDS
ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
1
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
92.15 3 y p.a(%)
2
Global X 21Shares Bitcoin ETF
53.24 3 y p.a(%)
3
Global X GlobalX FANG+ ETF
43.15 3 y p.a(%)
4
DomaCom Shoreline North Coogee
36.26 3 y p.a(%)
5
GAM LSA Private Shares AU I
35.87 3 y p.a(%)
