Concern about default funds

9 March 2010
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Russell Clarke

Members of the superannuation industry have voiced concerns about suggestions that better default super funds should be built in response to a lack of member engagement.

The chief investment officer of Mercer, Russell Clarke, recently suggested default super funds that rolled members through progressively defensive investment options as they aged could be a solution to the lack of engagement by super members.

Jeremy Kruse, a senior wealth strategist at Melbourne planning practice Moneyclip, said that while he didn’t dispute the idea, he was concerned that by shifting superannuation holders in default funds into increasingly conservative investment positions as they aged, the purchasing power of their super would diminish over time.

There was a real risk that too conservative a position would not keep up with inflation and provide them with an income over a 30 to 40-year period, he said.

There was no one-size-fits-all portfolio for members, but an exposure of at least 40 per cent to 50 per cent to growth assets at retirement was a good outcome, he said.

There also needed to be sufficient liquid assets to keep delivering an income stream, Kruse said.

The managing director of Matrix Planning Solutions, Rick Di Cristoforo, told Super Review that the public needed to consider the entire financial advice spectrum rather than engaging only with super, thus creating better default super funds to fix a lack of engagement would not help address a lack of interest in their financial future as a whole.

“Just getting superannuation sorted out is too small in scope and too narrow ... engagement should be about their financial future, and that’s a much bigger, more important issue,” he said.

The managing director of Snowball Group, Tony McDonald, said that while he agreed with enhancing default funds to get better outcomes for members, for example by instituting “opt-out default fund options”, there was a risk that members would be conscripted into collective solutions without having member information readily available.

Super funds should give members the choice of opting out, but only if that did not become the “lazy way” of dealing with consumers, or lead to people giving up on engaging with members, McDonald said.

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest developments in Super Review! Anytime, Anywhere!

Grant Banner

From my perspective, 40- 50% of people are likely going to be deeply unhappy about how long they actually live. ...

1 year 6 months ago
Kevin Gorman

Super director remuneration ...

1 year 6 months ago
Anthony Asher

No doubt true, but most of it is still because over 45’s have been upgrading their houses with 30 year mortgages. Money ...

1 year 6 months ago

Large superannuation accounts may need to find funds outside their accounts or take the extreme step of selling non-liquid assets under the proposed $3 million super tax ...

3 days 1 hour ago

Economists have been left scrambling to recalibrate after the Reserve Bank wrong-footed markets on Tuesday, holding the cash rate steady despite widespread expectations o...

3 days 1 hour ago

Institutional investors have increased their risk exposure over June amid tempered levels of market volatility....

3 days 1 hour ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Fund name
3y(%)pa
2
DomaCom DFS Mortgage
95.46 3 y p.a(%)
5