The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) has released new analysis illustrating the impact of the COVID-19 early release of superannuation (ERS) scheme on both individuals and superannuation funds.
ASFA deputy chief executive, Glen McCrea, said the COVID-19 early release of superannuation scheme was a success in terms of making a large number of payments in a very short period of time to those Australians in need, but that it did not come without problems.
"Young people, women, single parents and the unemployed paid a high price in terms of the cost to their retirement savings,” he said.
The 2020 ERS arrangements were unprecedented in both scope and size. Despite needing to set up new systems at short notice, ASFA analysis concluded that Australian superannuation funds coped well. In particular, the analysis found:
Many Australians and temporary residents faced considerable financial stress due to COVID-19 impacts on the economy and employment. However, ERS applicants paid a relatively high price for the monies released, both in terms of the impact on eventual retirement savings and in taking a benefit when investment markets were temporarily well down. ASFA’s key findings include:
"While superannuation was able to do much of the heavy lifting by distributing payments to people quickly in the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic, it’s important that we recognise the detrimental impact that this has had for the retirement savings of millions of Australians," concluded McCrea.
"It’s more important than ever that we legislate the objective of super to ensure that Australians’ savings are preserved to support a dignified lifestyle in retirement.”
A member body representing some prominent wealth managers is concerned super funds’ dominance is sidelining small companies in capital markets.
Earlier this month, several Australian superannuation funds fell victim to credential stuffing attacks, which saw a small number of members lose more than $500,000.
Small- to medium-sized funds have become collateral damage in an "imperfect" model for super industry levies, a financial institution has said.
Big business has joined the chorus of opposition against the proposed Division 296 tax.